The courts will not require a person to do all the household chores or raise children in a particular religion.  In recent years, some couples have included social media provisions in their prenuptial agreements that set out rules for what can be posted on social media during the marriage, as well as in the event that the marriage is dissolved.  Some federal laws apply to the terms that may be contained in a prenuptial agreement. The Retirement Equity Act (REA) of 1984, signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on August 23, 1984, reconciled confusion about whether ERISA preempted state divorce laws, thereby preventing pension plans from complying with court orders granting a spouse a portion of the employee`s pension in a divorce decree.  A prenuptial agreement may contain waivers whereby each spouse agrees to release all claims against the other party`s pension benefits arising out of the marriage under federal and state law, such as under the CSR. These conditions are found in clause 1466 of the Commercial and Civil Code of Thailand. In accordance with Thai marriage laws, the marriage contract mainly refers to the assets and financial implications of the marriage and defines the conditions for the ownership and management of personal and concrete common property and the possible division of matrimonial property when the marriage is dissolved. The marriage contract also includes a list of each party`s personal property at the time of the marriage and ensures that debts and property remain in the possession of the original owner or debtor before the marriage. Personal property includes: Unlike all other contract laws, no consideration is required, although a minority of courts indicate the marriage itself in return. Through a prenup, a spouse can completely renounce property, maintenance or inheritance rights, as well as the elective share, and receive nothing in return. Choice of law provisions are crucial in the area of law.
The parties to the agreement may choose that the law of the State in which they are married governs both the interpretation of the agreement and the division of property at the time of divorce. In the absence of a choice of law clause, the law of the place where the parties divorce does not govern the law of the State in which they married. In many of the countries mentioned, marriages can also protect unshared property and money from bankruptcy and can be used to support litigation and settlements during marriage (e.g. B if a party has wrongly sold or pledged property set aside by its partner). However, legal experts say that there is no need for such marriage contracts in the Indian system. Supreme Court attorney Shashwat Anand said, “All the reasons why you enter into a marriage contract are already included in the Hindu Marriage Act and contain very clear provisions regarding divorce.” Recently, a movement has emerged in some modern Orthodox circles that supports an additional marriage contract. This is a reaction to an increasing number of cases where the husband refuses to grant a religious divorce. In such matters, local authorities are not in a position to intervene, both for the sake of the separation of Church and State and because certain halakhic problems would arise. This situation leaves the woman in a state of aginut where she cannot remarry. To remedy this, the movement promotes a marriage contract in which the couple agrees to proceed with their divorce before a rabbinical court if it is this.
The test case radmacher v. Granatino of the Supreme Court of 2010 overturned the previous legal framework that allowed them to recognize the evolution of social and legal views on the personal autonomy of spouses.   Preliminary marriage contracts can now be enforced by the courts at their discretion in financial settlement cases under section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, provided that the three-step Radmacher test is met and it is considered fair to do so taking into account the interests of a child of the family. Radmacher believes that the courts will give effect to a prenuptial agreement that is freely entered into by either party with a full understanding of its effects, unless it is not fair in the current circumstances for the parties to abide by their agreement. The case contained a significant amount of relevant guidance for all marriage contract cases that have occurred since 2010.  When drafting an agreement, it is important to keep in mind that there are two types of state laws that govern divorce – equitable distribution practiced by 41 states and community property practiced in some variants by 9 states. An agreement drafted in a State belonging to the Community may not be intended to regulate what happens in an equitably distributed State and vice versa. It may be necessary to hire lawyers in both States to cover the possible case where the parties live in a State other than the State in which they married. Often people have more than one home in different states or they move a lot because of their work, so it`s important to take this into account in the design process.
Marriage contracts have not been considered legally enforceable in England and Wales in the past due to a stay of justice on grounds of public policy. .